BZH vs VSTS: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (BZH) and Vestis Corporation (VSTS) carry a correlation of 0.38, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BZH and VSTS?
On 3 years of weekly data the BZH/VSTS correlation comes out at 0.38, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.53) than the 3-year average (0.38). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 1113.4 %².
Out of 12 assets tracked against BZH, VSTS lands near the bottom at #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VSTS outperformed by 146.4 percentage points (+30.8% for BZH against +177.2% for VSTS).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BZH vs VSTS: side by side
| BZH (Beazer Homes USA, Inc.) | VSTS (Vestis Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.8% | +177.2% |
| 5-year return | +78.6% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 48.3% | 61.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.27 | 0.98 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -49.8% | -81.6% |
| Market cap | $0.9B | $1.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BZH | VSTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -45.0% | – |
| 2023 | +164.8% | – |
| 2024 | -18.7% | -27.2% |
| 2025 | -26.2% | -56.1% |
| 2026 | +63.9% | +91.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BZH and VSTS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BZH and VSTS?
The BZH/VSTS correlation stands at 0.38 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.53, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VSTS a good diversifier for BZH?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.38 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bzh-vs-vsts.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bzh-vs-vsts/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BZH correlations · VSTS correlations
