PairBook
HomeBZAI › BZAI vs ICE

BZAI vs ICE: Correlation

Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-378.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BZAI and ICE?

Over the past 3 years, BZAI and ICE moved with a correlation of -0.18, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.23) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -378.7 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against BZAI, ICE ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: ICE led by 79.4 percentage points, -87.3% for BZAI against -7.9% for ICE. Risk is not evenly split, since BZAI carries 4.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BZAI vs ICE: side by side

BZAI (Blaize Holdings, Inc.)ICE (Intercontinental Exchange)
1-year return-87.3%-7.9%
5-year return-94.8%+44.2%
Volatility (ann.)97.0%21.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.550.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.0%-33.9%
Market cap$0.1B$90.5B
P/E (trailing)22.7
Dividend yield0.00%1.24%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: ICE 1.24% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ICE -33.9% vs -97.0%Higher 5y return: ICE +44.2% vs -94.8%
-85%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BZAI · ICE

Year-by-year returns

YearBZAIICE
2022-23.9%
2023+5.6%+27.1%
2024+39.8%+17.5%
2025-87.0%+9.9%
2026-73.8%+0.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BZAI and ICE good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, BZAI and ICE have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BZAI and ICE?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.18 over 3 years, with -0.23 over the last year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is ICE a good diversifier for BZAI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, BZAI and ICE have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bzai-vs-ice.json

BZAI vs ICE: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18BZAI vs ICE-0.18

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BZAI vs ICE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bzai-vs-ice.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bzai-vs-ice/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BZAI correlations · ICE correlations