PairBook
HomeBZ › BZ vs TDF

BZ vs TDF: Correlation

KANZHUN LIMITED - American Depository Shares (BZ) and Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.70.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.70
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.73
long-run
Ann. covariance
768.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BZ and TDF?

Over the past 3 years, BZ and TDF moved with a correlation of 0.70, which is strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.39) runs below the 3-year figure (0.70). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.73, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 768.5 %².

In BZ's tracked universe of 17 assets, TDF sits right near the top at #3. The last year tells two different stories: TDF led by 24.1 percentage points, -20.7% for BZ against +3.4% for TDF. One caveat on sizing: BZ is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BZ vs TDF: side by side

BZ (KANZHUN LIMITED - American Depository Shares)TDF (Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc.)
1-year return-20.7%+3.4%
5-year return-47.9%-29.3%
Volatility (ann.)49.3%22.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.200.64
Max drawdown (3Y)-51.6%-22.2%
Market cap$8.0B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)12.93.6
Dividend yield0.00%3.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: TDF 3.6 vs 12.9Higher yield: TDF 3.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TDF -22.2% vs -51.6%Higher 5y return: TDF -29.3% vs -47.9%
-45%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BZ · TDF

Year-by-year returns

YearBZTDF
2022-41.6%-32.9%
2023-17.5%-20.1%
2024-16.9%+5.5%
2025+48.7%+37.7%
2026-11.7%-1.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BZ and TDF good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.70 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BZ and TDF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BZ and TDF is 0.70 over 3 years, 0.39 over 1 year and 0.73 over 5 years.

Is TDF a good diversifier for BZ?

To a limited degree. At 0.70 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.70 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bz-vs-tdf.json

BZ vs TDF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.70BZ vs TDF0.70

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BZ vs TDF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bz-vs-tdf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bz-vs-tdf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BZ correlations · TDF correlations