PairBook
HomeBX › BX vs MLGO

BX vs MLGO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Blackstone Inc. (BX) and MicroAlgo, Inc. (MLGO) carry a correlation of -0.14, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.14
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2328.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BX and MLGO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BX and MLGO correlate at -0.14, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.43 versus -0.14 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -2328.9 %².

Within BX's tracked universe of 35 assets, MLGO comes in at #28 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BX ahead by 40.0 points (-12.9% versus -52.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: MLGO runs 14.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BX vs MLGO: side by side

BX (Blackstone Inc.)MLGO (MicroAlgo, Inc.)
1-year return-12.9%-52.9%
5-year return+37.5%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)34.0%489.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.36-2.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-46.5%-100.0%
Market cap$171.7B
P/E (trailing)32.11.9
Dividend yield3.65%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: MLGO 1.9 vs 32.1Higher yield: BX 3.65% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BX -46.5% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: BX +37.5% vs -100.0%
-61%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BX · MLGO

Year-by-year returns

YearBXMLGO
2022-40.0%-87.6%
2023+82.7%-27.0%
2024+35.1%-97.9%
2025-7.8%-96.1%
2026-3.9%-6.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BX and MLGO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BX and MLGO?

The BX/MLGO correlation stands at -0.14 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.43, 5 years: -0.08), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MLGO a good diversifier for BX?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.14 mean?

A reading of -0.14 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bx-vs-mlgo.json

BX vs MLGO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.14BX vs MLGO-0.14

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BX vs MLGO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bx-vs-mlgo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bx-vs-mlgo/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BX correlations · MLGO correlations