PairBook
HomeBX › BX vs LICN

BX vs LICN: Correlation

Blackstone Inc. (BX) and Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-49927.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BX and LICN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BX and LICN correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.19) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -49927.4 %².

Out of 35 assets tracked against BX, LICN lands near the bottom at #31. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BX outperformed by 61.8 percentage points (-12.9% for BX against -74.7% for LICN). Risk is not evenly split, since LICN carries 250.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BX vs LICN: side by side

BX (Blackstone Inc.)LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)
1-year return-12.9%-74.7%
5-year return+37.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)34.0%8528.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.36-80.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-46.5%-98.4%
Market cap$171.7B
P/E (trailing)32.1
Dividend yield3.65%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: BX 3.65% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BX -46.5% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BX · LICN

Year-by-year returns

YearBXLICN
2022-40.0%
2023+82.7%
2024+35.1%-91.0%
2025-7.8%+1484.3%
2026-3.9%-56.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BX and LICN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, BX and LICN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BX and LICN?

The BX/LICN correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.19, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LICN a good diversifier for BX?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, BX and LICN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bx-vs-licn.json

BX vs LICN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17BX vs LICN-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BX vs LICN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bx-vs-licn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bx-vs-licn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BX correlations · LICN correlations