PairBook
HomeBWFG › BWFG vs VXZ

BWFG vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.46, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.46
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.44
long-run
Ann. covariance
-316.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BWFG and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BWFG and VXZ correlate at -0.46, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.41 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.44, with an annualized covariance of -316.7 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of BWFG's tracked universe, ranking #13 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: BWFG led by 73.6 percentage points, +57.5% for BWFG against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BWFG vs VXZ: side by side

BWFG (Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+57.5%-16.1%
5-year return+149.4%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)26.8%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.73-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-24.7%-36.4%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)12.3
Dividend yield1.22%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BWFG -24.7% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: BWFG +149.4% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BWFG · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearBWFGVXZ
2022-8.2%+0.5%
2023+5.8%-44.0%
2024+6.4%-12.7%
2025+50.3%+5.7%
2026+46.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BWFG and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.46, BWFG and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BWFG and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.46 over 3 years, with -0.41 over the last year and -0.44 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for BWFG?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.46, BWFG and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.46 mean?

A reading of -0.46 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bwfg-vs-vxz.json

BWFG vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.46BWFG vs VXZ-0.46

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BWFG vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bwfg-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bwfg-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BWFG correlations · VXZ correlations