PairBook
HomeBUD › BUD vs CL

BUD vs CL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA Sponsored ADR (Belgium) (BUD) and Colgate-Palmolive (CL) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
219.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BUD and CL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BUD and CL correlate at 0.48, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.54 over 1 year against 0.48 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.42, with an annualized covariance of 219.4 %².

Within BUD's tracked universe of 15 assets, CL comes in at #6 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BUD ahead by 17.4 points (+27.8% versus +10.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since BUD carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BUD vs CL: side by side

BUD (Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA Sponsored ADR (Belgium))CL (Colgate-Palmolive)
1-year return+27.8%+10.4%
5-year return+39.0%+32.0%
Volatility (ann.)26.7%16.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.380.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.5%-29.0%
Market cap$155.8B$72.5B
P/E (trailing)16.936.2
Dividend yield1.50%2.27%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: BUD 16.9 vs 36.2Higher yield: CL 2.27% vs 1.50%Smaller drawdown: CL -29.0% vs -31.5%Higher 5y return: BUD +39.0% vs +32.0%
-9%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BUD · CL

Year-by-year returns

YearBUDCL
2022+0.1%-5.4%
2023+9.0%+3.8%
2024-21.4%+16.6%
2025+30.1%-11.0%
2026+25.4%+17.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BUD and CL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BUD and CL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BUD and CL is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.54 over 1 year and 0.42 over 5 years.

Is CL a good diversifier for BUD?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bud-vs-cl.json

BUD vs CL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48BUD vs CL0.48

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BUD vs CL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bud-vs-cl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bud-vs-cl/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BUD correlations · CL correlations