PairBook
HomeBTU › BTU vs WDFC

BTU vs WDFC: Correlation

How closely do Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and WD-40 Company (WDFC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-289.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTU and WDFC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BTU and WDFC correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.19 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.02, with an annualized covariance of -289.8 %².

WDFC is close to the least connected end of BTU's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BTU ahead by 76.9 points (+77.6% versus +0.7%). Risk is not evenly split, since BTU carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTU vs WDFC: side by side

BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation)WDFC (WD-40 Company)
1-year return+77.6%+0.7%
5-year return+95.9%+0.9%
Volatility (ann.)52.8%27.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.730.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.1%-34.2%
Market cap$3.6B$2.9B
P/E (trailing)33.3
Dividend yield1.10%1.85%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WDFC 1.85% vs 1.10%Smaller drawdown: WDFC -34.2% vs -65.1%Higher 5y return: BTU +95.9% vs +0.9%
-12%0%+108%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTU · WDFC

Year-by-year returns

YearBTUWDFC
2022+162.4%-33.0%
2023-7.0%+50.9%
2024-12.8%+2.9%
2025+44.2%-17.4%
2026-0.0%+12.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTU and WDFC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, BTU and WDFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTU and WDFC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.19 over the last year and -0.02 over 5 years.

Is WDFC a good diversifier for BTU?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, BTU and WDFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btu-vs-wdfc.json

BTU vs WDFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20BTU vs WDFC-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BTU vs WDFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btu-vs-wdfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btu-vs-wdfc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTU correlations · WDFC correlations