PairBook
HomeBTT › BTT vs LEO

BTT vs LEO: Correlation

How closely do BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust (BTT) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc. (LEO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.74, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.74
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.66
long-run
Ann. covariance
59.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTT and LEO?

On 3 years of weekly data the BTT/LEO correlation comes out at 0.74, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.65) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.66, and annualized covariance runs at 59.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, LEO places #4 of the 13 assets tracked against BTT. Over the last 12 months LEO came out ahead by 6.3 percentage points (+3.9% against +10.2%). One caveat on sizing: LEO is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTT vs LEO: side by side

BTT (BlackRock Municipal 2030 Target Term Trust)LEO (BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals, Inc.)
1-year return+3.9%+10.2%
5-year return-1.1%-18.0%
Volatility (ann.)6.6%12.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.170.26
Max drawdown (3Y)-6.5%-13.1%
Market cap$1.4B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)16.430.9
Dividend yield2.46%4.41%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BTT 16.4 vs 30.9Higher yield: LEO 4.41% vs 2.46%Smaller drawdown: BTT -6.5% vs -13.1%Higher 5y return: BTT -1.1% vs -18.0%
-1%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTT · LEO

Year-by-year returns

YearBTTLEO
2022-15.2%-24.1%
2023+0.7%+0.1%
2024+1.6%+6.9%
2025+13.7%+9.9%
2026+0.6%+0.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTT and LEO good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.74 means BTT and LEO share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTT and LEO?

The BTT/LEO correlation stands at 0.74 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.65, 5 years: 0.66), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LEO a good diversifier for BTT?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.74 means BTT and LEO share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.74 mean?

A reading of 0.74 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btt-vs-leo.json

BTT vs LEO: 3-year weekly correlation 0.74BTT vs LEO0.74

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BTT vs LEO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btt-vs-leo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btt-vs-leo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTT correlations · LEO correlations