PairBook
HomeBTOG › BTOG vs FSTR

BTOG vs FSTR: Correlation

How closely do Bit Origin Limited - Class A (BTOG) and L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2728.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTOG and FSTR?

On 3 years of weekly data the BTOG/FSTR correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.09 versus -0.26 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.20, and annualized covariance runs at -2728.3 %².

FSTR is close to the least connected end of BTOG's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FSTR ahead by 140.0 points (-97.2% versus +42.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since BTOG carries 4.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTOG vs FSTR: side by side

BTOG (Bit Origin Limited - Class A)FSTR (L.B. Foster Company)
1-year return-97.2%+42.8%
5-year return-100.0%+119.1%
Volatility (ann.)229.6%46.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.611.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-45.9%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)35.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FSTR -45.9% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: FSTR +119.1% vs -100.0%
-96%0%+69%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTOG · FSTR

Year-by-year returns

YearBTOGFSTR
2022-87.2%-29.6%
2023-21.4%+127.2%
2024-76.4%+22.3%
2025-82.4%+0.2%
2026-93.1%+40.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTOG and FSTR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BTOG and FSTR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTOG and FSTR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with -0.09 over the last year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is FSTR a good diversifier for BTOG?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BTOG and FSTR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btog-vs-fstr.json

BTOG vs FSTR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26BTOG vs FSTR-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BTOG vs FSTR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btog-vs-fstr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btog-vs-fstr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTOG correlations · FSTR correlations