PairBook
HomeBTMD › BTMD vs SLF

BTMD vs SLF: Correlation

Biote Corp. (BTMD) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.37.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.37
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
469.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTMD and SLF?

Over the past 3 years, BTMD and SLF moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.48 versus 0.37 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.23, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 469.5 %².

Within BTMD's tracked universe of 11 assets, SLF comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SLF outperformed by 91.5 percentage points (-51.5% for BTMD against +40.0% for SLF). Note the risk asymmetry: BTMD runs 3.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTMD vs SLF: side by side

BTMD (Biote Corp.)SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.)
1-year return-51.5%+40.0%
5-year return-83.1%+84.1%
Volatility (ann.)67.5%18.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.160.52
Max drawdown (3Y)-84.4%-14.9%
Market cap$0.1B$43.8B
P/E (trailing)10.918.5
Dividend yield0.00%4.66%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BTMD 10.9 vs 18.5Higher yield: SLF 4.66% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SLF -14.9% vs -84.4%Higher 5y return: SLF +84.1% vs -83.1%
-62%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTMD · SLF

Year-by-year returns

YearBTMDSLF
2022-61.9%-12.9%
2023+32.4%+16.9%
2024+25.1%+19.5%
2025-57.9%+7.3%
2026-37.3%+29.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTMD and SLF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTMD and SLF?

The BTMD/SLF correlation stands at 0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.48, 5 years: 0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SLF a good diversifier for BTMD?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?

A reading of 0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btmd-vs-slf.json

BTMD vs SLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.37BTMD vs SLF0.37

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BTMD vs SLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btmd-vs-slf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btmd-vs-slf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTMD correlations · SLF correlations