PairBook
HomeBTG › BTG vs DGZ

BTG vs DGZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, B2Gold Corp (BTG) and DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DGZ) carry a correlation of -0.32, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
-505.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTG and DGZ?

Over the past 3 years, BTG and DGZ moved with a correlation of -0.32, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.24 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.40, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -505.9 %².

DGZ is close to the least connected end of BTG's tracked universe, ranking #16 of 16. The last year tells two different stories: BTG led by 71.5 percentage points, +44.9% for BTG against -26.6% for DGZ. Risk is not evenly split, since BTG carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTG vs DGZ: side by side

BTG (B2Gold Corp)DGZ (DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038)
1-year return+44.9%-26.6%
5-year return+85.7%-50.3%
Volatility (ann.)55.7%28.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.12-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.7%-59.5%
Market cap$7.7B
P/E (trailing)10.4
Dividend yield1.39%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BTG -40.7% vs -59.5%Higher 5y return: BTG +85.7% vs -50.3%
-28%0%+48%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTG · DGZ

Year-by-year returns

YearBTGDGZ
2022-5.1%+4.9%
2023-7.2%-4.7%
2024-18.1%-16.5%
2025+87.2%-32.5%
2026+30.4%-10.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTG and DGZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTG and DGZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.32 over 3 years, with -0.24 over the last year and -0.40 over 5 years.

Is DGZ a good diversifier for BTG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btg-vs-dgz.json

BTG vs DGZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32BTG vs DGZ-0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BTG vs DGZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btg-vs-dgz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btg-vs-dgz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTG correlations · DGZ correlations