PairBook
HomeBTCT › BTCT vs PHAT

BTCT vs PHAT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PHAT) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.06
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-15445.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTCT and PHAT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BTCT and PHAT correlate at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.06) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.26). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.20, with an annualized covariance of -15445.6 %².

Within BTCT's tracked universe of 52 assets, PHAT comes in at #36 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance BTCT holds a 7.9-point edge, -20.2% against -28.1%. Note the risk asymmetry: BTCT runs 5.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTCT vs PHAT: side by side

BTCT (BTC Digital Ltd.)PHAT (Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
1-year return-20.2%-28.1%
5-year return-99.5%-74.1%
Volatility (ann.)571.6%103.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-2.211.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.8%-88.3%
Market cap$0.7B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PHAT -88.3% vs -97.8%Higher 5y return: PHAT -74.1% vs -99.5%
-82%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BTCT · PHAT

Year-by-year returns

YearBTCTPHAT
2022-97.6%-43.0%
2023+33.9%-18.6%
2024-0.8%-11.1%
2025-72.8%+104.3%
2026+61.5%-46.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTCT and PHAT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BTCT and PHAT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTCT and PHAT?

The BTCT/PHAT correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.06, 5 years: -0.20), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PHAT a good diversifier for BTCT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BTCT and PHAT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btct-vs-phat.json

BTCT vs PHAT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26BTCT vs PHAT-0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BTCT vs PHAT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btct-vs-phat.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btct-vs-phat/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTCT correlations · PHAT correlations