PairBook
HomeBTBD › BTBD vs FSTR

BTBD vs FSTR: Correlation

How closely do BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) and L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1125.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTBD and FSTR?

Over the past 3 years, BTBD and FSTR moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.53) than the 3-year average (-0.30). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1125.7 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against BTBD, FSTR lands near the bottom at #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FSTR ahead by 65.3 points (-22.5% versus +42.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: BTBD runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTBD vs FSTR: side by side

BTBD (BT Brands, Inc.)FSTR (L.B. Foster Company)
1-year return-22.5%+42.8%
5-year return-67.8%+119.1%
Volatility (ann.)82.0%46.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.391.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.7%-45.9%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)35.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FSTR -45.9% vs -65.7%Higher 5y return: FSTR +119.1% vs -67.8%
-54%0%+69%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BTBD · FSTR

Year-by-year returns

YearBTBDFSTR
2022-38.1%-29.6%
2023+36.8%+127.2%
2024-42.4%+22.3%
2025-3.5%+0.2%
2026+2.1%+40.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTBD and FSTR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTBD and FSTR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BTBD and FSTR is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.53 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is FSTR a good diversifier for BTBD?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btbd-vs-fstr.json

BTBD vs FSTR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30BTBD vs FSTR-0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BTBD vs FSTR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btbd-vs-fstr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btbd-vs-fstr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTBD correlations · FSTR correlations