PairBook
HomeBSAC › BSAC vs EMBJ

BSAC vs EMBJ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Banco Santander - Chile (BSAC) and Embraer S.A. (EMBJ) carry a correlation of 0.45, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.45
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
491.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BSAC and EMBJ?

Over the past 3 years, BSAC and EMBJ moved with a correlation of 0.45, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.68) runs above the 3-year figure (0.45). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.32, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 491.3 %².

Within BSAC's tracked universe of 15 assets, EMBJ comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BSAC led by 18.9 percentage points, +54.5% for BSAC against +35.6% for EMBJ. One caveat on sizing: EMBJ is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BSAC vs EMBJ: side by side

BSAC (Banco Santander - Chile)EMBJ (Embraer S.A.)
1-year return+54.5%+35.6%
5-year return+119.0%+327.0%
Volatility (ann.)25.9%41.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.4%-32.6%
Market cap$16.4B$13.4B
P/E (trailing)13.430.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BSAC 13.4 vs 30.5Higher yield: EMBJ 0.95% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BSAC -18.4% vs -32.6%Higher 5y return: EMBJ +327.0% vs +119.0%
-10%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BSAC · EMBJ

Year-by-year returns

YearBSACEMBJ
2022+3.0%-38.4%
2023+31.7%+68.8%
2024+0.9%+98.8%
2025+74.3%+75.7%
2026+17.7%+17.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BSAC and EMBJ good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.45, BSAC and EMBJ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BSAC and EMBJ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BSAC and EMBJ is 0.45 over 3 years, 0.68 over 1 year and 0.32 over 5 years.

Is EMBJ a good diversifier for BSAC?

Reasonably. At 0.45, BSAC and EMBJ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?

A reading of 0.45 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bsac-vs-embj.json

BSAC vs EMBJ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.45BSAC vs EMBJ0.45

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BSAC vs EMBJ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bsac-vs-embj.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bsac-vs-embj/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BSAC correlations · EMBJ correlations