PairBook
HomeBRLS › BRLS vs WTW

BRLS vs WTW: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Borealis Foods Inc. - Class A (BRLS) and Willis Towers Watson (WTW) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-949.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BRLS and WTW?

Over the past 3 years, BRLS and WTW moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.38) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -949.2 %².

Among the 21 assets we track against BRLS, WTW sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #18. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WTW outperformed by 65.9 percentage points (-61.7% for BRLS against +4.2% for WTW). Risk is not evenly split, since BRLS carries 6.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BRLS vs WTW: side by side

BRLS (Borealis Foods Inc. - Class A)WTW (Willis Towers Watson)
1-year return-61.7%+4.2%
5-year return-88.7%+68.3%
Volatility (ann.)160.0%23.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.090.32
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.8%-30.4%
Market cap$31.5B
P/E (trailing)21.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.55%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: WTW 0.55% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WTW -30.4% vs -94.8%Higher 5y return: WTW +68.3% vs -88.7%
-76%0%+40%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BRLS · WTW

Year-by-year returns

YearBRLSWTW
2022+4.6%+4.5%
2023+9.5%+0.1%
2024-47.3%+31.5%
2025-66.5%+6.1%
2026-44.5%+4.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BRLS and WTW good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BRLS and WTW?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is WTW a good diversifier for BRLS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brls-vs-wtw.json

BRLS vs WTW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25BRLS vs WTW-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BRLS vs WTW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/brls-vs-wtw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brls-vs-wtw/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BRLS correlations · WTW correlations