PairBook
HomeBRLS › BRLS vs RJF

BRLS vs RJF: Correlation

Borealis Foods Inc. - Class A (BRLS) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-647.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BRLS and RJF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BRLS and RJF correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.40 versus -0.16 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.11, with an annualized covariance of -647.9 %².

By 3-year correlation, RJF places #11 of the 21 assets tracked against BRLS. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RJF outperformed by 68.0 percentage points (-61.7% for BRLS against +6.3% for RJF). Risk is not evenly split, since BRLS carries 6.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BRLS vs RJF: side by side

BRLS (Borealis Foods Inc. - Class A)RJF (Raymond James Financial)
1-year return-61.7%+6.3%
5-year return-88.7%+102.1%
Volatility (ann.)160.0%24.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.091.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.8%-28.1%
Market cap$33.8B
P/E (trailing)15.4
Dividend yield0.00%1.20%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: RJF 1.20% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RJF -28.1% vs -94.8%Higher 5y return: RJF +102.1% vs -88.7%
-76%0%+40%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BRLS · RJF

Year-by-year returns

YearBRLSRJF
2022+4.6%+8.3%
2023+9.5%+6.1%
2024-47.3%+40.8%
2025-66.5%+4.7%
2026-44.5%+10.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BRLS and RJF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BRLS and RJF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BRLS and RJF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BRLS and RJF is -0.16 over 3 years, -0.40 over 1 year and -0.11 over 5 years.

Is RJF a good diversifier for BRLS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BRLS and RJF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brls-vs-rjf.json

BRLS vs RJF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16BRLS vs RJF-0.16

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BRLS vs RJF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/brls-vs-rjf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brls-vs-rjf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BRLS correlations · RJF correlations