PairBook
HomeBQ › BQ vs KALA

BQ vs KALA: Correlation

How closely do Boqii Holding Limited Class A (BQ) and KALA BIO, Inc. (KALA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-9748.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BQ and KALA?

Over the past 3 years, BQ and KALA moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.43) than the 3-year average (-0.30). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.06, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -9748.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, KALA places #12 of the 17 assets tracked against BQ. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BQ outperformed by 32.9 percentage points (-66.9% for BQ against -99.8% for KALA). Note the risk asymmetry: BQ runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BQ vs KALA: side by side

BQ (Boqii Holding Limited Class A)KALA (KALA BIO, Inc.)
1-year return-66.9%-99.8%
5-year return-99.8%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)275.5%119.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.871.73
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.2%-99.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BQ -98.2% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: BQ -99.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+408%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BQ · KALA

Year-by-year returns

YearBQKALA
2022-77.1%-36.9%
2023-88.5%-81.7%
2024-22.1%-0.9%
2025-43.6%-92.0%
2026-54.7%-97.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BQ and KALA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, BQ and KALA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BQ and KALA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BQ and KALA is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.43 over 1 year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is KALA a good diversifier for BQ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, BQ and KALA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

A reading of -0.30 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bq-vs-kala.json

BQ vs KALA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30BQ vs KALA-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BQ vs KALA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bq-vs-kala.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bq-vs-kala/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BQ correlations · KALA correlations