PairBook
HomeBP › BP vs MLM

BP vs MLM: Correlation

How closely do BP p.l.c. (BP) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-126.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BP and MLM?

On 3 years of weekly data the BP/MLM correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.48 versus -0.20 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.02, and annualized covariance runs at -126.2 %².

Within BP's tracked universe of 26 assets, MLM comes in at #16 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BP led by 41.4 percentage points, +27.6% for BP against -13.8% for MLM.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BP vs MLM: side by side

BP (BP p.l.c.)MLM (Martin Marietta Materials)
1-year return+27.6%-13.8%
5-year return+119.9%+42.4%
Volatility (ann.)26.6%23.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.060.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-30.6%-26.8%
Market cap$109.0B$37.5B
P/E (trailing)20.334.4
Dividend yield0.79%0.62%
Sector / categoryUS ListedMaterials
Lower P/E: BP 20.3 vs 34.4Higher yield: BP 0.79% vs 0.62%Smaller drawdown: MLM -26.8% vs -30.6%Higher 5y return: BP +119.9% vs +42.4%
-15%0%+43%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BP · MLM

Year-by-year returns

YearBPMLM
2022+37.0%-22.7%
2023+6.0%+48.6%
2024-11.8%+4.1%
2025+24.5%+21.3%
2026+26.4%-14.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BP and MLM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BP and MLM?

The BP/MLM correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.48, 5 years: -0.02), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MLM a good diversifier for BP?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bp-vs-mlm.json

BP vs MLM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20BP vs MLM-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BP vs MLM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bp-vs-mlm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bp-vs-mlm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BP correlations · MLM correlations