BNT vs VINP: Correlation
Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. Class A Exchangeable (BNT) and Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. - Class A (VINP) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BNT and VINP?
On 3 years of weekly data the BNT/VINP correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.47 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.40, and annualized covariance runs at 341.7 %².
Among the 28 assets we track against BNT, VINP ranks #19 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives VINP the advantage: -4.5% versus +1.6%, a 6.1-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BNT vs VINP: side by side
| BNT (Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. Class A Exchangeable) | VINP (Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -4.5% | +1.6% |
| 5-year return | +3.6% | -3.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.1% | 24.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.44 | 0.76 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -27.6% | -28.9% |
| Market cap | $11.4B | $0.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 50.0 | 13.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 37.52% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BNT | VINP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -49.5% | -9.3% |
| 2023 | +30.1% | +30.5% |
| 2024 | +43.3% | -1.9% |
| 2025 | +20.6% | +37.4% |
| 2026 | -9.4% | -22.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BNT and VINP good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.49, BNT and VINP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BNT and VINP?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BNT and VINP is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.47 over 1 year and 0.40 over 5 years.
Is VINP a good diversifier for BNT?
Reasonably. At 0.49, BNT and VINP keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.49 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bnt-vs-vinp.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bnt-vs-vinp/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BNT correlations · VINP correlations
