PairBook
HomeBN › BN vs CVNA

BN vs CVNA: Correlation

Brookfield Corporation Class A Limited Voting Shares (BN) and Carvana (CVNA) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.54.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.54
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
1143.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BN and CVNA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BN and CVNA correlate at 0.54, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.50 over 1 year against 0.54 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.50, with an annualized covariance of 1143.6 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against BN, CVNA ranks #18 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives CVNA the advantage: -4.5% versus +0.8%, a 5.3-point spread. One caveat on sizing: CVNA is 2.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BN vs CVNA: side by side

BN (Brookfield Corporation Class A Limited Voting Shares)CVNA (Carvana)
1-year return-4.5%+0.8%
5-year return+42.1%+9.7%
Volatility (ann.)28.8%73.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.472.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.8%-53.5%
Market cap$92.5B$82.1B
P/E (trailing)76.739.0
Dividend yield0.62%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: CVNA 39.0 vs 76.7Higher yield: BN 0.62% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BN -27.8% vs -53.5%Higher 5y return: BN +42.1% vs +9.7%
-24%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BN · CVNA

Year-by-year returns

YearBNCVNA
2022-34.6%-98.0%
2023+28.6%+1016.9%
2024+44.2%+284.1%
2025+20.5%+107.5%
2026-9.4%-12.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BN and CVNA good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.54 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BN and CVNA?

The BN/CVNA correlation stands at 0.54 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.50, 5 years: 0.50), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CVNA a good diversifier for BN?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.54 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.54 mean?

A reading of 0.54 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bn-vs-cvna.json

BN vs CVNA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.54BN vs CVNA0.54

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BN vs CVNA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bn-vs-cvna.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bn-vs-cvna/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BN correlations · CVNA correlations