PairBook
HomeBMY › BMY vs ZSQR

BMY vs ZSQR: Correlation

Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) and Z Squared Inc. (ZSQR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-495.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMY and ZSQR?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BMY and ZSQR correlate at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.40) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.18). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -495.5 %².

Out of 31 assets tracked against BMY, ZSQR lands near the bottom at #31. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BMY ahead by 115.5 points (+47.3% versus -68.2%). Risk is not evenly split, since ZSQR carries 3.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMY vs ZSQR: side by side

BMY (Bristol Myers Squibb)ZSQR (Z Squared Inc.)
1-year return+47.3%-68.2%
5-year return+22.3%-97.9%
Volatility (ann.)27.8%98.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.200.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.1%-89.7%
Market cap$136.8B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)14.9
Dividend yield3.71%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: BMY 3.71% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BMY -34.1% vs -89.7%Higher 5y return: BMY +22.3% vs -97.9%
-70%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BMY · ZSQR

Year-by-year returns

YearBMYZSQR
2022+19.0%-84.7%
2023-26.1%-48.8%
2024+15.8%-64.9%
2025+0.1%+159.1%
2026+28.3%-70.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMY and ZSQR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, BMY and ZSQR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMY and ZSQR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.18 over 3 years, with -0.40 over the last year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is ZSQR a good diversifier for BMY?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, BMY and ZSQR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmy-vs-zsqr.json

BMY vs ZSQR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18BMY vs ZSQR-0.18

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BMY vs ZSQR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmy-vs-zsqr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmy-vs-zsqr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMY correlations · ZSQR correlations