PairBook
HomeBMN › BMN vs VXZ

BMN vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.37, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.37
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
-88.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMN and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the BMN/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.37, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.33 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.32, and annualized covariance runs at -88.4 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against BMN, VXZ lands near the bottom at #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BMN ahead by 27.0 points (+10.9% versus -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: VXZ is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMN vs VXZ: side by side

BMN (BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+10.9%-16.1%
5-year returnn/a-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)9.4%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.18-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-9.3%-36.4%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)22.7
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BMN -9.3% vs -36.4%
-16%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BMN · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearBMNVXZ
2022+0.5%
2023+1.9%-44.0%
2024+12.7%-12.7%
2025+5.5%+5.7%
2026+4.2%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMN and VXZ?

The BMN/VXZ correlation stands at -0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: -0.32), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for BMN?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.37 mean?

A reading of -0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmn-vs-vxz.json

BMN vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.37BMN vs VXZ-0.37

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BMN vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmn-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmn-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMN correlations · VXZ correlations