PairBook
HomeBMI › BMI vs SUIG

BMI vs SUIG: Correlation

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Sui Group Holdings Limited (SUIG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1740.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMI and SUIG?

Over the past 3 years, BMI and SUIG moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.12 versus -0.30 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.19, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1740.5 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against BMI, SUIG lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: BMI led by 57.3 percentage points, -26.1% for BMI against -83.4% for SUIG. One caveat on sizing: SUIG is 4.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMI vs SUIG: side by side

BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.)SUIG (Sui Group Holdings Limited)
1-year return-26.1%-83.4%
5-year return+33.9%-88.3%
Volatility (ann.)35.9%162.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.621.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.1%-89.2%
Market cap$4.0B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)32.1
Dividend yield1.17%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BMI 1.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BMI -55.1% vs -89.2%Higher 5y return: BMI +33.9% vs -88.3%
-87%0%+3%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BMI · SUIG

Year-by-year returns

YearBMISUIG
2022+3.2%-75.1%
2023+42.6%+19.5%
2024+38.3%-20.3%
2025-17.2%-14.4%
2026-20.3%-38.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMI and SUIG good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMI and SUIG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BMI and SUIG is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.12 over 1 year and -0.19 over 5 years.

Is SUIG a good diversifier for BMI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmi-vs-suig.json

BMI vs SUIG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30BMI vs SUIG-0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BMI vs SUIG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmi-vs-suig.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmi-vs-suig/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMI correlations · SUIG correlations