PairBook
HomeBMBL › BMBL vs MEGL

BMBL vs MEGL: Correlation

Bumble Inc. (BMBL) and Magic Empire Global Limited - Class A (MEGL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2558.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMBL and MEGL?

Over the past 3 years, BMBL and MEGL moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.26) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2558.5 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against BMBL, MEGL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MEGL ahead by 40.2 points (-56.9% versus -16.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: MEGL runs 2.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMBL vs MEGL: side by side

BMBL (Bumble Inc.)MEGL (Magic Empire Global Limited - Class A)
1-year return-56.9%-16.7%
5-year return-95.1%n/a
Volatility (ann.)58.7%170.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.18-0.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-84.7%-68.7%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MEGL -68.7% vs -84.7%
-60%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BMBL · MEGL

Year-by-year returns

YearBMBLMEGL
2022-37.8%
2023-30.0%-7.3%
2024-44.8%-54.4%
2025-56.1%+117.6%
2026-24.1%-0.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMBL and MEGL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BMBL and MEGL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMBL and MEGL?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with 0.26 over the last year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is MEGL a good diversifier for BMBL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BMBL and MEGL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmbl-vs-megl.json

BMBL vs MEGL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26BMBL vs MEGL-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BMBL vs MEGL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmbl-vs-megl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmbl-vs-megl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMBL correlations · MEGL correlations