PairBook
HomeBLFS › BLFS vs VXZ

BLFS vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.51, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.51
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-647.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BLFS and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, BLFS and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.51, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.34) than the 3-year average (-0.51). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.38, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -647.9 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of BLFS's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 15. The last year tells two different stories: BLFS led by 62.4 percentage points, +46.3% for BLFS against -16.1% for VXZ. Risk is not evenly split, since BLFS carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BLFS vs VXZ: side by side

BLFS (BioLife Solutions, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+46.3%-16.1%
5-year return-36.2%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)50.1%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.66-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-37.0%-36.4%
Market cap$1.8B
P/E (trailing)37.2
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -37.0%Higher 5y return: BLFS -36.2% vs -53.1%
-31%0%+41%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BLFS · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearBLFSVXZ
2022-51.2%+0.5%
2023-10.7%-44.0%
2024+59.8%-12.7%
2025-6.9%+5.7%
2026+53.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BLFS and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.51 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BLFS and VXZ?

The BLFS/VXZ correlation stands at -0.51 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.34, 5 years: -0.38), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for BLFS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.51 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.51 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/blfs-vs-vxz.json

BLFS vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.51BLFS vs VXZ-0.51

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BLFS vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/blfs-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/blfs-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BLFS correlations · VXZ correlations