PairBook
HomeBLDR › BLDR vs SSD

BLDR vs SSD: Correlation

Builders FirstSource (BLDR) and Simpson Manufacturing Company, Inc. (SSD) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.69.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.70
long-run
Ann. covariance
927.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BLDR and SSD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BLDR and SSD correlate at 0.69, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.65 over 1 year against 0.69 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.70, with an annualized covariance of 927.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, SSD places #20 of the 48 assets tracked against BLDR. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SSD ahead by 47.3 points (-52.6% versus -5.3%). One caveat on sizing: BLDR is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BLDR vs SSD: side by side

BLDR (Builders FirstSource)SSD (Simpson Manufacturing Company, Inc.)
1-year return-52.6%-5.3%
5-year return+25.8%+65.7%
Volatility (ann.)45.6%29.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.360.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.7%-34.4%
Market cap$7.2B$7.5B
P/E (trailing)74.720.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.63%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: SSD 20.3 vs 74.7Higher yield: SSD 0.63% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SSD -34.4% vs -68.7%Higher 5y return: SSD +65.7% vs +25.8%
-56%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BLDR · SSD

Year-by-year returns

YearBLDRSSD
2022-24.3%-35.6%
2023+157.3%+125.4%
2024-14.4%-15.7%
2025-28.0%-1.9%
2026-34.7%+13.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BLDR and SSD good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BLDR and SSD?

The BLDR/SSD correlation stands at 0.69 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.65, 5 years: 0.70), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SSD a good diversifier for BLDR?

To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

A reading of 0.69 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bldr-vs-ssd.json

BLDR vs SSD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69BLDR vs SSD0.69

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BLDR vs SSD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bldr-vs-ssd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bldr-vs-ssd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BLDR correlations · SSD correlations