PairBook
HomeBLDP › BLDP vs WM

BLDP vs WM: Correlation

How closely do Ballard Power Systems, Inc. (BLDP) and Waste Management (WM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-280.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BLDP and WM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BLDP and WM correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.37) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -280.8 %².

WM is close to the least connected end of BLDP's tracked universe, ranking #19 of 23. The last year tells two different stories: BLDP led by 17.8 percentage points, +15.8% for BLDP against -2.0% for WM. One caveat on sizing: BLDP is 3.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BLDP vs WM: side by side

BLDP (Ballard Power Systems, Inc.)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return+15.8%-2.0%
5-year return-85.8%+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)66.3%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.620.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-76.4%-18.1%
Market cap$0.7B$87.0B
P/E (trailing)30.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -76.4%Higher 5y return: WM +51.8% vs -85.8%
-9%0%+216%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BLDP · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearBLDPWM
2022-61.9%-4.5%
2023-22.8%+16.2%
2024-55.1%+14.3%
2025+53.0%+10.5%
2026-7.9%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BLDP and WM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, BLDP and WM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BLDP and WM?

The BLDP/WM correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: -0.05), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WM a good diversifier for BLDP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, BLDP and WM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bldp-vs-wm.json

BLDP vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23BLDP vs WM-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BLDP vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bldp-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bldp-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BLDP correlations · WM correlations