BKNG vs FVRR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Booking Holdings (BKNG) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carry a correlation of 0.43, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BKNG and FVRR?
Over the past 3 years, BKNG and FVRR moved with a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.34 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.42, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 636.0 %².
Within BKNG's tracked universe of 39 assets, FVRR comes in at #24 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BKNG ahead by 50.4 points (-9.1% versus -59.5%). Risk is not evenly split, since FVRR carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BKNG vs FVRR: side by side
| BKNG (Booking Holdings) | FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -9.1% | -59.5% |
| 5-year return | +127.1% | -94.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 29.1% | 50.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.11 | 1.08 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -33.4% | -75.6% |
| Market cap | $152.2B | $0.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 23.2 | 11.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BKNG | FVRR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -16.0% | -74.4% |
| 2023 | +76.0% | -6.6% |
| 2024 | +41.3% | +16.6% |
| 2025 | +8.6% | -37.7% |
| 2026 | -5.0% | -52.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BKNG and FVRR good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.43, BKNG and FVRR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BKNG and FVRR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.43 over 3 years, with 0.34 over the last year and 0.42 over 5 years.
Is FVRR a good diversifier for BKNG?
Reasonably. At 0.43, BKNG and FVRR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bkng-vs-fvrr.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bkng-vs-fvrr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BKNG correlations · FVRR correlations
