PairBook
HomeBKH › BKH vs CPK

BKH vs CPK: Correlation

Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.69.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.67
long-run
Ann. covariance
304.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BKH and CPK?

On 3 years of weekly data the BKH/CPK correlation comes out at 0.69, strong. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.55 versus 0.69 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.67, and annualized covariance runs at 304.6 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against BKH, CPK ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BKH outperformed by 16.4 percentage points (+26.5% for BKH against +10.1% for CPK).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BKH vs CPK: side by side

BKH (Black Hills Corporation)CPK (Chesapeake Utilities Corporation)
1-year return+26.5%+10.1%
5-year return+27.4%+13.6%
Volatility (ann.)21.5%20.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.320.12
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.1%-22.0%
Market cap$5.6B$3.2B
P/E (trailing)18.521.4
Dividend yield3.74%2.08%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BKH 18.5 vs 21.4Higher yield: BKH 3.74% vs 2.08%Smaller drawdown: BKH -14.1% vs -22.0%Higher 5y return: BKH +27.4% vs +13.6%
-2%0%+31%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BKH · CPK

Year-by-year returns

YearBKHCPK
2022+3.1%-17.6%
2023-19.9%-8.8%
2024+13.6%+17.4%
2025+23.9%+5.1%
2026+8.8%+8.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BKH and CPK good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.69 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BKH and CPK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.69 over 3 years, with 0.55 over the last year and 0.67 over 5 years.

Is CPK a good diversifier for BKH?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.69 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

A reading of 0.69 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bkh-vs-cpk.json

BKH vs CPK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69BKH vs CPK0.69

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BKH vs CPK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bkh-vs-cpk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bkh-vs-cpk/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BKH correlations · CPK correlations