PairBook
HomeBIIB › BIIB vs ZCMD

BIIB vs ZCMD: Correlation

Biogen (BIIB) and Zhongchao Inc. - Class A (ZCMD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-858.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BIIB and ZCMD?

Over the past 3 years, BIIB and ZCMD moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.14 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -858.2 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against BIIB, ZCMD ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BIIB outperformed by 162.3 percentage points (+62.4% for BIIB against -99.9% for ZCMD). Risk is not evenly split, since ZCMD carries 4.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BIIB vs ZCMD: side by side

BIIB (Biogen)ZCMD (Zhongchao Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+62.4%-99.9%
5-year return-35.7%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)30.1%141.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.7%-100.0%
Market cap$32.7B
P/E (trailing)39.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BIIB -57.7% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: BIIB -35.7% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+58%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BIIB · ZCMD

Year-by-year returns

YearBIIBZCMD
2022+15.4%-35.4%
2023-6.6%-69.5%
2024-40.9%-53.8%
2025+15.1%-72.2%
2026+25.9%-99.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BIIB and ZCMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, BIIB and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BIIB and ZCMD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BIIB and ZCMD is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.14 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is ZCMD a good diversifier for BIIB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, BIIB and ZCMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/biib-vs-zcmd.json

BIIB vs ZCMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20BIIB vs ZCMD-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BIIB vs ZCMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/biib-vs-zcmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/biib-vs-zcmd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BIIB correlations · ZCMD correlations