PairBook
HomeBHV › BHV vs SOC

BHV vs SOC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust (BHV) and Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-294.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BHV and SOC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BHV and SOC correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.35) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.11, with an annualized covariance of -294.9 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against BHV, SOC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BHV outperformed by 115.1 percentage points (+31.5% for BHV against -83.6% for SOC). Risk is not evenly split, since SOC carries 8.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BHV vs SOC: side by side

BHV (BlackRock Virginia Municipal Bond Trust)SOC (Sable Offshore Corp.)
1-year return+31.5%-83.6%
5-year return-16.7%-51.7%
Volatility (ann.)12.5%101.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.200.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-11.5%-90.7%
Market cap$0.9B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield4.82%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BHV 4.82% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BHV -11.5% vs -90.7%Higher 5y return: BHV -16.7% vs -51.7%
-83%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BHV · SOC

Year-by-year returns

YearBHVSOC
2022-36.1%+3.4%
2023-1.0%+13.3%
2024+6.0%+101.1%
2025+0.8%-60.6%
2026+24.4%-48.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BHV and SOC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, BHV and SOC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BHV and SOC?

The BHV/SOC correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.35, 5 years: -0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SOC a good diversifier for BHV?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, BHV and SOC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bhv-vs-soc.json

BHV vs SOC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23BHV vs SOC-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BHV vs SOC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bhv-vs-soc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bhv-vs-soc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BHV correlations · SOC correlations