BGMS vs TELO: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Bio Green Med Solution, Inc. (BGMS) and Telomir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TELO) carry a correlation of 0.44, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BGMS and TELO?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BGMS and TELO correlate at 0.44, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.08 versus 0.44 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 11119.7 %².
Few assets follow BGMS as closely as TELO, which ranks #3 of 15 tracked partners. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TELO ahead by 69.4 points (-89.0% versus -19.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since BGMS carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BGMS vs TELO: side by side
| BGMS (Bio Green Med Solution, Inc.) | TELO (Telomir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -89.0% | -19.6% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 203.4% | 119.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.91 | 1.22 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -92.3% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BGMS | TELO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -82.8% | – |
| 2023 | -73.4% | – |
| 2024 | -85.8% | – |
| 2025 | -96.6% | -67.7% |
| 2026 | -39.8% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BGMS and TELO good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.44, BGMS and TELO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BGMS and TELO?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.44 over 3 years, with 0.08 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is TELO a good diversifier for BGMS?
Reasonably. At 0.44, BGMS and TELO keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?
A reading of 0.44 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgms-vs-telo.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgms-vs-telo/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BGMS correlations · TELO correlations
