BGM vs SNTG: Correlation
How closely do BGM Group Ltd. - Class A (BGM) and Sentage Holdings Inc. - Class A (SNTG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.48, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BGM and SNTG?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BGM and SNTG correlate at 0.48, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.28 versus 0.48 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.37, with an annualized covariance of 6132.7 %².
In BGM's tracked universe of 11 assets, SNTG sits right near the top at #1. The last year tells two different stories: SNTG led by 104.3 percentage points, -96.4% for BGM against +7.9% for SNTG.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BGM vs SNTG: side by side
| BGM (BGM Group Ltd. - Class A) | SNTG (Sentage Holdings Inc. - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -96.4% | +7.9% |
| 5-year return | -98.5% | -93.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 101.6% | 126.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.50 | 1.13 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -76.2% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BGM | SNTG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -72.1% | -68.8% |
| 2023 | +7.5% | +160.4% |
| 2024 | +119.2% | -63.8% |
| 2025 | -56.3% | +4.4% |
| 2026 | -92.1% | -5.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BGM and SNTG good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BGM and SNTG?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.48 over 3 years, with 0.28 over the last year and 0.37 over 5 years.
Is SNTG a good diversifier for BGM?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.48 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgm-vs-sntg.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgm-vs-sntg/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BGM correlations · SNTG correlations
