PairBook
HomeBGI › BGI vs REPL

BGI vs REPL: Correlation

Birks Group Inc. (BGI) and Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2558.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BGI and REPL?

Over the past 3 years, BGI and REPL moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.29 over 1 year against -0.26 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.18, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2558.3 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against BGI, REPL lands near the bottom at #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months REPL outperformed by 233.5 percentage points (-51.4% for BGI against +182.1% for REPL). Note the risk asymmetry: REPL runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BGI vs REPL: side by side

BGI (Birks Group Inc.)REPL (Replimune Group, Inc.)
1-year return-51.4%+182.1%
5-year return-88.1%-50.4%
Volatility (ann.)64.1%153.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.380.48
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.1%-92.0%
Market cap$1.5B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: REPL -92.0% vs -93.1%Higher 5y return: REPL -50.4% vs -88.1%
-66%0%+146%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BGI · REPL

Year-by-year returns

YearBGIREPL
2022+63.5%+0.4%
2023-40.9%-69.0%
2024-65.7%+43.7%
2025-44.1%-19.7%
2026-61.1%+60.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BGI and REPL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BGI and REPL?

The BGI/REPL correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is REPL a good diversifier for BGI?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgi-vs-repl.json

BGI vs REPL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26BGI vs REPL-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BGI vs REPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bgi-vs-repl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgi-vs-repl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BGI correlations · REPL correlations