BGC vs VXZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BGC Group, Inc. (BGC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.35, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BGC and VXZ?
Over the past 3 years, BGC and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.35, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.28 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.34, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -306.6 %².
Among the 10 assets we track against BGC, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BGC outperformed by 37.6 percentage points (+21.5% for BGC against -16.1% for VXZ).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BGC vs VXZ: side by side
| BGC (BGC Group, Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.5% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +146.1% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 34.0% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.90 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -34.5% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $5.8B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 29.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BGC | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -18.1% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +93.0% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +26.5% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | -0.6% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +36.3% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BGC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BGC and VXZ?
The BGC/VXZ correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for BGC?
Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgc-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgc-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BGC correlations · VXZ correlations
