PairBook
HomeBG › BG vs PSQH

BG vs PSQH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Bunge Global (BG) and PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-709.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BG and PSQH?

Over the past 3 years, BG and PSQH moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -709.7 %².

Within BG's tracked universe of 37 assets, PSQH comes in at #29 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BG outperformed by 109.7 percentage points (+35.2% for BG against -74.5% for PSQH). Note the risk asymmetry: PSQH runs 3.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BG vs PSQH: side by side

BG (Bunge Global)PSQH (PSQ Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+35.2%-74.5%
5-year return+68.5%-95.6%
Volatility (ann.)30.7%99.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.092.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-38.8%-98.4%
Market cap$21.4B
P/E (trailing)24.4
Dividend yield2.51%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: BG 2.51% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BG -38.8% vs -98.4%Higher 5y return: BG +68.5% vs -95.6%
-88%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BG · PSQH

Year-by-year returns

YearBGPSQH
2022+9.3%+3.1%
2023+3.8%-47.3%
2024-20.7%-13.4%
2025+18.6%-77.3%
2026+27.5%-59.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BG and PSQH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BG and PSQH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BG and PSQH is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is PSQH a good diversifier for BG?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bg-vs-psqh.json

BG vs PSQH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23BG vs PSQH-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BG vs PSQH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bg-vs-psqh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bg-vs-psqh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BG correlations · PSQH correlations