PairBook
HomeBFST › BFST vs MXC

BFST vs MXC: Correlation

How closely do Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) and Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-352.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BFST and MXC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BFST and MXC correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.21) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.06, with an annualized covariance of -352.4 %².

Out of 19 assets tracked against BFST, MXC lands near the bottom at #17. Their 12-month results are close: +25.6% for BFST against +21.6% for MXC. One caveat on sizing: MXC is 2.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BFST vs MXC: side by side

BFST (Business First Bancshares, Inc.)MXC (Mexco Energy Corporation)
1-year return+25.6%+21.6%
5-year return+47.5%+7.2%
Volatility (ann.)29.7%62.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.82-0.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.3%-60.6%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)11.113.0
Dividend yield1.93%1.02%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BFST 11.1 vs 13.0Higher yield: BFST 1.93% vs 1.02%Smaller drawdown: BFST -27.3% vs -60.6%Higher 5y return: BFST +47.5% vs +7.2%
-12%0%+77%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BFST · MXC

Year-by-year returns

YearBFSTMXC
2022-20.2%+33.0%
2023+14.4%-26.2%
2024+6.9%+24.6%
2025+4.0%-10.8%
2026+21.3%-0.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BFST and MXC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BFST and MXC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BFST and MXC is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.21 over 1 year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is MXC a good diversifier for BFST?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bfst-vs-mxc.json

BFST vs MXC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19BFST vs MXC-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BFST vs MXC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bfst-vs-mxc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bfst-vs-mxc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BFST correlations · MXC correlations