PairBook
HomeBFRI › BFRI vs MCK

BFRI vs MCK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Biofrontera Inc. (BFRI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.03
long-run
Ann. covariance
-438.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BFRI and MCK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BFRI and MCK correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.18 over 1 year against -0.19 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.03, with an annualized covariance of -438.4 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against BFRI, MCK lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BFRI outperformed by 42.5 percentage points (+73.3% for BFRI against +30.8% for MCK). One caveat on sizing: BFRI is 3.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BFRI vs MCK: side by side

BFRI (Biofrontera Inc.)MCK (McKesson Corporation)
1-year return+73.3%+30.8%
5-year return-98.3%+354.8%
Volatility (ann.)92.3%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.660.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.9%-27.2%
Market cap$103.8B
P/E (trailing)24.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.37%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: MCK 0.37% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCK -27.2% vs -93.9%Higher 5y return: MCK +354.8% vs -98.3%
-15%0%+76%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BFRI · MCK

Year-by-year returns

YearBFRIMCK
2022-87.8%+51.8%
2023-84.9%+24.1%
2024-60.6%+23.7%
2025-47.7%+44.5%
2026+161.4%+8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BFRI and MCK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, BFRI and MCK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BFRI and MCK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.18 over the last year and -0.03 over 5 years.

Is MCK a good diversifier for BFRI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, BFRI and MCK have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bfri-vs-mck.json

BFRI vs MCK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19BFRI vs MCK-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BFRI vs MCK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bfri-vs-mck.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bfri-vs-mck/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BFRI correlations · MCK correlations