BFRG vs FC: Correlation
Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. (BFRG) and Franklin Covey Company (FC) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.44.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BFRG and FC?
On 3 years of weekly data the BFRG/FC correlation comes out at 0.44, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.64) than the 3-year average (0.44). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 3170.8 %².
In BFRG's tracked universe of 10 assets, FC sits right near the top at #2. The last year tells two different stories: FC led by 58.5 percentage points, -55.1% for BFRG against +3.4% for FC. Risk is not evenly split, since BFRG carries 2.6 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BFRG vs FC: side by side
| BFRG (Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc.) | FC (Franklin Covey Company) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.1% | +3.4% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -52.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 136.8% | 52.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 3.10 | 1.11 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -93.8% | -74.0% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 135.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BFRG | FC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +0.9% |
| 2023 | – | -6.9% |
| 2024 | -38.7% | -13.7% |
| 2025 | -55.8% | -55.3% |
| 2026 | -36.0% | +21.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BFRG and FC good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.44, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BFRG and FC?
The BFRG/FC correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.64, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is FC a good diversifier for BFRG?
A fair diversifier. At 0.44, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bfrg-vs-fc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bfrg-vs-fc/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BFRG correlations · FC correlations
