PairBook
HomeBFH › BFH vs VXZ

BFH vs VXZ: Correlation

Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.47.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.47
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.46
long-run
Ann. covariance
-502.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BFH and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, BFH and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.47, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.29 versus -0.47 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.46, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -502.1 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of BFH's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 11. The last year tells two different stories: BFH led by 82.9 percentage points, +66.8% for BFH against -16.1% for VXZ. One caveat on sizing: BFH is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BFH vs VXZ: side by side

BFH (Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+66.8%-16.1%
5-year return+55.9%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)42.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.26-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-36.7%-36.4%
Market cap$4.2B
P/E (trailing)8.3
Dividend yield0.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -36.7%Higher 5y return: BFH +55.9% vs -53.1%
-18%0%+73%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BFH · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearBFHVXZ
2022-42.4%+0.5%
2023-10.2%-44.0%
2024+89.0%-12.7%
2025+23.1%+5.7%
2026+46.7%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BFH and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.47, BFH and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BFH and VXZ?

The BFH/VXZ correlation stands at -0.47 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.46), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for BFH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.47, BFH and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.47 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bfh-vs-vxz.json

BFH vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.47BFH vs VXZ-0.47

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BFH vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bfh-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bfh-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BFH correlations · VXZ correlations