BFC vs VXZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Bank First Corporation (BFC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.44, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BFC and VXZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the BFC/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.44, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.28 versus -0.44 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.38, and annualized covariance runs at -303.6 %².
VXZ is close to the least connected end of BFC's tracked universe, ranking #13 of 13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BFC ahead by 34.5 points (+18.4% versus -16.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BFC vs VXZ: side by side
| BFC (Bank First Corporation) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +18.4% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +139.3% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 26.7% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.70 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -15.7% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $1.7B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.0 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BFC | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +30.0% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -5.3% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +16.4% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +28.7% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +25.6% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BFC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.44, BFC and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BFC and VXZ?
The BFC/VXZ correlation stands at -0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.38), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for BFC?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.44, BFC and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.44 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.44 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bfc-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bfc-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BFC correlations · VXZ correlations
