BETR vs LAC: Correlation
How closely do Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETR) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BETR and LAC?
Over the past 3 years, BETR and LAC moved with a correlation of 0.38, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.57 versus 0.38 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 3569.2 %².
Few assets follow BETR as closely as LAC, which ranks #1 of 12 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: LAC led by 37.9 percentage points, -31.5% for BETR against +6.4% for LAC.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BETR vs LAC: side by side
| BETR (Better Home & Finance Holding Company) | LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -31.5% | +6.4% |
| 5-year return | -97.1% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 101.5% | 93.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.13 | 1.37 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -86.5% | -81.8% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | $1.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BETR | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +1.9% | – |
| 2023 | -91.9% | – |
| 2024 | -78.2% | -53.6% |
| 2025 | +265.2% | +46.8% |
| 2026 | -55.2% | -27.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BETR and LAC good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BETR and LAC?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BETR and LAC is 0.38 over 3 years, 0.57 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is LAC a good diversifier for BETR?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.38 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.38 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/betr-vs-lac.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/betr-vs-lac/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BETR correlations · LAC correlations
