PairBook
HomeBENF › BENF vs CMT

BENF vs CMT: Correlation

How closely do Beneficient (BENF) and Core Molding Technologies Inc (CMT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1591.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BENF and CMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BENF and CMT correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.30) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -1591.6 %².

CMT is close to the least connected end of BENF's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CMT outperformed by 53.4 percentage points (-22.9% for BENF against +30.5% for CMT). Note the risk asymmetry: BENF runs 4.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BENF vs CMT: side by side

BENF (Beneficient)CMT (Core Molding Technologies Inc)
1-year return-22.9%+30.5%
5-year return-100.0%+80.4%
Volatility (ann.)176.6%40.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.250.39
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-56.0%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)29.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CMT -56.0% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: CMT +80.4% vs -100.0%
-34%0%+124%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BENF · CMT

Year-by-year returns

YearBENFCMT
2022+3.7%+52.6%
2023-95.3%+42.6%
2024-98.1%-10.7%
2025+18.0%+21.2%
2026-69.3%+24.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BENF and CMT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BENF and CMT?

The BENF/CMT correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.30, 5 years: -0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CMT a good diversifier for BENF?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/benf-vs-cmt.json

BENF vs CMT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22BENF vs CMT-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BENF vs CMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/benf-vs-cmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/benf-vs-cmt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BENF correlations · CMT correlations