PairBook
HomeBDMD › BDMD vs VSTM

BDMD vs VSTM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd (BDMD) and Verastem, Inc. (VSTM) carry a correlation of 0.40, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.28
long-run
Ann. covariance
7579.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BDMD and VSTM?

On 3 years of weekly data the BDMD/VSTM correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.13) than the 3-year average (0.40). The 5-year figure is 0.28, and annualized covariance runs at 7579.8 %².

Within BDMD's tracked universe of 15 assets, VSTM comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: VSTM led by 34.3 percentage points, -54.9% for BDMD against -20.6% for VSTM. Risk is not evenly split, since BDMD carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BDMD vs VSTM: side by side

BDMD (Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd)VSTM (Verastem, Inc.)
1-year return-54.9%-20.6%
5-year return-88.5%-77.0%
Volatility (ann.)187.8%102.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.541.38
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.6%-84.4%
Market cap$0.7B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VSTM -84.4% vs -93.6%Higher 5y return: VSTM -77.0% vs -88.5%
-67%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BDMD · VSTM

Year-by-year returns

YearBDMDVSTM
2022+4.1%-80.5%
2023+4.4%+69.6%
2024-29.0%-36.5%
2025-82.1%+49.3%
2026-18.4%-4.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BDMD and VSTM good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.40, BDMD and VSTM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BDMD and VSTM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.40 over 3 years, with 0.13 over the last year and 0.28 over 5 years.

Is VSTM a good diversifier for BDMD?

Reasonably. At 0.40, BDMD and VSTM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bdmd-vs-vstm.json

BDMD vs VSTM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40BDMD vs VSTM0.40

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BDMD vs VSTM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bdmd-vs-vstm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bdmd-vs-vstm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BDMD correlations · VSTM correlations