BDL vs EPRX: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) and Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (EPRX) carry a correlation of 0.31, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BDL and EPRX?
On 3 years of weekly data the BDL/EPRX correlation comes out at 0.31, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.41 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 635.4 %².
Few assets follow BDL as closely as EPRX, which ranks #3 of 12 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: BDL led by 24.5 percentage points, +63.9% for BDL against +39.4% for EPRX.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BDL vs EPRX: side by side
| BDL (Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.) | EPRX (Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +63.9% | +39.4% |
| 5-year return | +118.2% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 39.5% | 49.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.37 | 1.06 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -30.5% | -35.9% |
| Market cap | – | $0.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BDL | EPRX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -13.7% | – |
| 2023 | +0.8% | – |
| 2024 | +0.0% | – |
| 2025 | +19.2% | +138.2% |
| 2026 | +64.1% | -2.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BDL and EPRX good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.31, BDL and EPRX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BDL and EPRX?
The BDL/EPRX correlation stands at 0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.41, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is EPRX a good diversifier for BDL?
Reasonably. At 0.31, BDL and EPRX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.31 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bdl-vs-eprx.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bdl-vs-eprx/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BDL correlations · EPRX correlations
