PairBook
HomeBDCZ › BDCZ vs BRAG

BDCZ vs BRAG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ETRACS MarketVector Business Development Companies Liquid (BDCZ) and Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (BRAG) carry a correlation of 0.36, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
360.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BDCZ and BRAG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BDCZ and BRAG correlate at 0.36, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.25 versus 0.36 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.27, with an annualized covariance of 360.2 %².

Among the 49 assets we track against BDCZ, BRAG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #45. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BDCZ ahead by 43.6 points (-4.0% versus -47.6%). Note the risk asymmetry: BRAG runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BDCZ vs BRAG: side by side

BDCZ (ETRACS MarketVector Business Development Companies Liquid)BRAG (Bragg Gaming Group Inc.)
1-year return-4.0%-47.6%
5-year return+29.0%-87.1%
Volatility (ann.)16.0%62.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.581.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.8%-78.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BDCZ -20.8% vs -78.8%Higher 5y return: BDCZ +29.0% vs -87.1%
-46%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BDCZ · BRAG

Year-by-year returns

YearBDCZBRAG
2022-9.1%-23.5%
2023+25.3%+31.2%
2024+12.2%-26.7%
2025-3.7%-43.2%
2026+0.4%-31.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BDCZ and BRAG good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.36, BDCZ and BRAG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BDCZ and BRAG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.36 over 3 years, with 0.25 over the last year and 0.27 over 5 years.

Is BRAG a good diversifier for BDCZ?

Reasonably. At 0.36, BDCZ and BRAG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bdcz-vs-brag.json

BDCZ vs BRAG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36BDCZ vs BRAG0.36

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BDCZ vs BRAG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bdcz-vs-brag.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bdcz-vs-brag/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BDCZ correlations · BRAG correlations