PairBook
HomeBDC › BDC vs FLS

BDC vs FLS: Correlation

Belden Inc (BDC) and Flowserve Corporation (FLS) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.56.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.56
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
815.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BDC and FLS?

Over the past 3 years, BDC and FLS moved with a correlation of 0.56, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.65 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.54, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 815.6 %².

FLS is one of the assets that tracks BDC most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 13 assets we track against BDC. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FLS outperformed by 61.0 percentage points (-9.6% for BDC against +51.4% for FLS).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BDC vs FLS: side by side

BDC (Belden Inc)FLS (Flowserve Corporation)
1-year return-9.6%+51.4%
5-year return+113.6%+131.6%
Volatility (ann.)39.2%37.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.171.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-35.8%-38.8%
Market cap$4.7B$10.4B
P/E (trailing)19.528.8
Dividend yield0.17%1.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BDC 19.5 vs 28.8Higher yield: FLS 1.04% vs 0.17%Smaller drawdown: BDC -35.8% vs -38.8%Higher 5y return: FLS +131.6% vs +113.6%
-22%0%+64%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BDC · FLS

Year-by-year returns

YearBDCFLS
2022+9.7%+3.1%
2023+7.7%+37.3%
2024+46.1%+41.9%
2025+3.7%+22.5%
2026+3.0%+18.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BDC and FLS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.56 means BDC and FLS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BDC and FLS?

The BDC/FLS correlation stands at 0.56 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.65, 5 years: 0.54), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FLS a good diversifier for BDC?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.56 means BDC and FLS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.56 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.56 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bdc-vs-fls.json

BDC vs FLS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.56BDC vs FLS0.56

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BDC vs FLS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bdc-vs-fls.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bdc-vs-fls/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BDC correlations · FLS correlations