PairBook
HomeBCPC › BCPC vs COST

BCPC vs COST: Correlation

Balchem Corporation (BCPC) and Costco (COST) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.40.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
178.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCPC and COST?

On 3 years of weekly data the BCPC/COST correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.42 over 1 year against 0.40 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.45, and annualized covariance runs at 178.2 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against BCPC, COST ranks #9 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance BCPC holds a 10.6-point edge, +9.6% against -1.0%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCPC vs COST: side by side

BCPC (Balchem Corporation)COST (Costco)
1-year return+9.6%-1.0%
5-year return+31.0%+116.3%
Volatility (ann.)22.7%19.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.570.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-23.1%-20.7%
Market cap$5.7B$414.5B
P/E (trailing)35.448.1
Dividend yield0.53%0.56%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: BCPC 35.4 vs 48.1Higher yield: COST 0.56% vs 0.53%Smaller drawdown: COST -20.7% vs -23.1%Higher 5y return: COST +116.3% vs +31.0%
-11%0%+13%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BCPC · COST

Year-by-year returns

YearBCPCCOST
2022-27.1%-19.0%
2023+22.5%+49.0%
2024+10.2%+39.6%
2025-5.3%-5.4%
2026+16.0%+8.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCPC and COST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCPC and COST?

The BCPC/COST correlation stands at 0.40 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.42, 5 years: 0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is COST a good diversifier for BCPC?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcpc-vs-cost.json

BCPC vs COST: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40BCPC vs COST0.40

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BCPC vs COST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcpc-vs-cost.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcpc-vs-cost/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCPC correlations · COST correlations