PairBook
HomeBCH › BCH vs PAGS

BCH vs PAGS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Banco De Chile (BCH) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. Class A (PAGS) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
514.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCH and PAGS?

Over the past 3 years, BCH and PAGS moved with a correlation of 0.50, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.55) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 514.6 %².

Within BCH's tracked universe of 15 assets, PAGS comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BCH outperformed by 49.8 percentage points (+55.4% for BCH against +5.6% for PAGS). Note the risk asymmetry: PAGS runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCH vs PAGS: side by side

BCH (Banco De Chile)PAGS (PagSeguro Digital Ltd. Class A)
1-year return+55.4%+5.6%
5-year return+219.8%-84.4%
Volatility (ann.)24.6%42.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.631.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.0%-57.6%
Market cap$21.0B$2.5B
P/E (trailing)15.86.2
Dividend yield0.00%14.99%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PAGS 6.2 vs 15.8Higher yield: PAGS 14.99% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BCH -20.0% vs -57.6%Higher 5y return: BCH +219.8% vs -84.4%
-9%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BCH · PAGS

Year-by-year returns

YearBCHPAGS
2022+41.2%-66.7%
2023+23.4%+42.7%
2024+6.1%-49.8%
2025+81.2%+58.7%
2026+16.1%-5.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCH and PAGS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means BCH and PAGS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCH and PAGS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BCH and PAGS is 0.50 over 3 years, 0.55 over 1 year and 0.35 over 5 years.

Is PAGS a good diversifier for BCH?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means BCH and PAGS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bch-vs-pags.json

BCH vs PAGS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50BCH vs PAGS0.50

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BCH vs PAGS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bch-vs-pags.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bch-vs-pags/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCH correlations · PAGS correlations